Confusion about results
Hi there,
I am evaluating several benchmark solutions for my university at the moment and I also used Geekbench 2.4.0 in the tryout mode for this case.
I ran it on the same hardware with different operating systems and got kind of confusing results. Please see the results in your online comparison with the following IDs:
1313919 (Debian 6 native, fully patched)
1302421 (Windows Server 2008 R2 native, fully patched)
1302417 (Debian 6 running on VMware vSphere 5.1)
1302499 (Windows Server 2008 R2 running on VMware vSphere 5.1)
What confuses me is the big difference I can see on the results. In my opinion with a CPU benchmark there shouldn't be such differences resulting only of running different operating systems. What confuses me even more is the fact, that Windows native is much slower than a virtualized Windows.
Is there any logical explanation for this phenomenon?
Keyboard shortcuts
Generic
? | Show this help |
---|---|
ESC | Blurs the current field |
Comment Form
r | Focus the comment reply box |
---|---|
^ + ↩ | Submit the comment |
You can use Command ⌘
instead of Control ^
on Mac
Support Staff 1 Posted by John on 22 Nov, 2012 07:31 PM
Ulf -
Thanks for your message. What power plan are you using when running Windows Server 2008 R2 natively? You can find the current power plan here:
Thanks,
John
2 Posted by ulf.klose on 28 Nov, 2012 12:00 PM
Hi John,
I changed the power plan to "Höchstleistung" (highest performance). The results do make much more sense now. Thanks for your input.
Ulf
Support Staff 3 Posted by John on 01 Dec, 2012 11:30 PM
Ulf -
I'm glad my suspicions were correct! Let me know if you have any other questions and I'd be happy to help out.
Best,
John