Suggestion for Geekbench 6.4

Igor_Kavinski's Avatar

Igor_Kavinski

05 Jun, 2024 08:43 AM

May I suggest running some of the accelerated tests using AVX-512/SME again in non-accelerated form so it serves as a better comparison point with CPUs that don't feature any acceleration? Also, it would be more informative if the test shows which SIMD extension was used (such as Blur Detection - AVX2) and the same one listed again without using AVX2. Even if this is not implemented for standard testing, it would be helpful to include it as an option that users may want to run and then you can see how popular it is with users who want to know how the subtest performance was achieved.

Related to comparisons in Geekbench Browser, may I suggest comparisons against more than one device, with UI similar to the one Intel ARK uses (checkbox for Add to Compare)? Furthermore, it would also be nice to have two separate categories shown for MT tests (one for tests that scale with the number of cores and another for the ones that don't) so there is no confusion and users can immediately jump to the comparison they are more interested in seeing.

Reply to this discussion

Internal reply

Formatting help / Preview (switch to plain text) No formatting (switch to Markdown)

Attaching KB article:

»

Attached Files

You can attach files up to 10MB

If you don't have an account yet, we need to confirm you're human and not a machine trying to post spam.

Keyboard shortcuts

Generic

? Show this help
ESC Blurs the current field

Comment Form

r Focus the comment reply box
^ + ↩ Submit the comment

You can use Command ⌘ instead of Control ^ on Mac