Home → Geekbench →

Geekbench Browser loss sorting function!

• Edit

ehh0xff

13 Sep, 2019 04:30 PM

Why sorting function in Geekbench Browser is removed?
And now it working only in some places

Return it please!

1. 1 Posted by Ed on 15 Oct, 2019 03:39 AM

   

   Still no sorting on Geekbench 5 browser results... What gives?

   • Edit

2. 2 Posted by jaime on 18 Oct, 2019 09:10 PM

   

   Hi ehh0xff and Ed,
   Can you tell me what sort features you are interested and which pages you would like to see them applied to?

   • Edit

3. 3 Posted by Artem S. Tashki... on 21 Oct, 2019 04:31 PM

   

   Jaime,

   Compare
   https://browser.geekbench.com/v4/cpu
   to
   https://browser.geekbench.com/v5/cpu

   Notice the difference.

   • Edit

4. 4 Posted by jaime on 21 Oct, 2019 05:47 PM

   

   Thanks, Artem. I've passed this request on to our web team.

   • Edit

5. 5 Posted by ehh0xff on 27 Oct, 2019 09:21 PM

   

   Jaime, when sorting is fixed, please also add the ability to sort and additional filtering by fields:
   motherboard
   platform
   user
   date

   Also, please remove wrong results (as Multicore score = -2147483648) and add comparsion more then two results.

   Thank you

   • Edit

6. 6 Posted by Colin on 13 Nov, 2019 05:53 PM

   

   Hi,

   Thanks for your additional suggestions! I've passed them along to my team as well, and I'll see if we can implement them in the future.

   Note that you can currently search by platform and motherboard in your queries. For example, try searching with platform:"macOS".

   Regarding incorrect results, we are regularly searching for results which appear to be incorrect. If you encounter any, please let us know and we'll investigate as soon as we can.

   All the best,
   Colin

   Primate Labs Inc.

   • Edit

7. 7 Posted by geogan on 21 Oct, 2020 01:19 PM

   

   A year later and STILL NO SORTING functionality on Geekbench 5 results!??!

   https://browser.geekbench.com/v5/cpu/search?q=3900x

   I don't understand whats going on. Surely any of you in there that looked at the CPU results page for more than a second would realize its useless as a 39,445 long UNSORTED list???

   • Edit

8. 8 Posted by Anton on 28 Nov, 2020 02:23 AM

   

   Just found that you can in fact sort! Just add the query parameters from the v4 sorted URL. For example, to find the fastest Geekbench5 3900x single-core scores:

   https://browser.geekbench.com/v5/cpu/search?q=3900x&dir=desc&sort=score

   To find the fastest multi-core scores:

   https://browser.geekbench.com/v5/cpu/search?q=3900x&dir=desc&sort=multicore_score

   • Edit

9. 9 Posted by Anton on 29 Nov, 2020 05:52 PM

   

   Alternatively, perform the Geekbench 4 search you want to do, then replace the 'v4' in the URL with 'v5'.

   • Edit

10. 10 Posted by Geekbench Canta... on 16 Oct, 2022 12:09 AM

    

    That’s nice. Why can’t they figure out how to simply allow users to sort and filter out the Bs they don’t wanna see right in the geekbench results? This is such a basic request. And get rid of all the stupid VM benchmarks. They are totally irrelevant to most people who are looking for bare metal performance. They can be quarantined off on their own dark corner for the folks who want to see geekbench scores of popular cloud offerings. 90% of site visitors are looking for bare metal performance benchmarks.

    • Edit

11. 11 Posted by Artem S. Tashki... on 17 Oct, 2022 08:26 PM

    

    Yeah, and VM benchmarks can be endlessly gamed.

    • Edit

12. 12 Posted by Artem S. Tashki... on 12 Sep, 2023 10:43 AM

    

    This has never been addressed or fixed.

    • Edit

13. 13 Posted by GawG on 24 Sep, 2023 08:08 PM

    

    Geek bench 6 same. Really poor. I was going to get a licence but there are multiple sign ins with dam picture crap, even when logged in. Plus the compare function is broken, surprised by crappiness of site!

    • Edit

14. 14 Posted by ehh0xff on 18 Jul, 2024 04:23 PM

    

    Nothing has changed in 5 years. It is sad.

    Moreover, GB5 and GB6 are absolutely inapplicable:
    start from GB5 - no longer tests memory bandwidth and latency
    and GB6 give is generally useless test results - GB6 in the multi-threaded test results of two EPYC 9634 processors are equal in performance with Ryzen 7900x!?!

    GB4 and browser GB4 still more applicable then broken gb5/6.

    • Edit

15. 15 Posted by geerlingguy on 26 Jul, 2024 01:17 AM

    

    It's interesting, the sorting options are still exposed for Geekbench 6 browser results via URL query parameters, but there's no UI options. It would be immensely helpful to have at least a sort on either single or multi for any search query or browser listing.

    I was trying to get a ranked list of the Pi 5 single core results, finally came up with the URL https://browser.geekbench.com/v6/cpu/search?dir=desc&q=Raspberry+Pi+5+Model+B&sort=score after digging into this comment thread.

    • Edit

16. 16 Posted by ehh0xff on 29 Aug, 2024 10:12 PM

    

    Multi-Core Score:
    

    24227 - AMD Ryzen 9 7950X @ 5.88 GHz 1 Processor, 16 Cores, 32 Threads
    24494 - AMD EPYC 9J14 @ 4.02 GHz 2 Processors, 192 Cores, 384 Threads
    

    Seriously?
    https://browser.geekbench.com/v6/cpu/compare/1899252?baseline=6294807

    :facepalm:

    • Edit