Geekbench Browser loss sorting function!

ehh0xff's Avatar

ehh0xff

13 Sep, 2019 04:30 PM

Why sorting function in Geekbench Browser is removed?
And now it working only in some places

Return it please!

  1. 1 Posted by Ed on 15 Oct, 2019 03:39 AM

    Ed's Avatar

    Still no sorting on Geekbench 5 browser results... What gives?

  2. 2 Posted by jaime on 18 Oct, 2019 09:10 PM

    jaime's Avatar

    Hi ehh0xff and Ed,
    Can you tell me what sort features you are interested and which pages you would like to see them applied to?

  3. 3 Posted by Artem S. Tashki... on 21 Oct, 2019 04:31 PM

    Artem S. Tashkinov's Avatar
  4. 4 Posted by jaime on 21 Oct, 2019 05:47 PM

    jaime's Avatar

    Thanks, Artem. I've passed this request on to our web team.

  5. 5 Posted by ehh0xff on 27 Oct, 2019 09:21 PM

    ehh0xff's Avatar

    Jaime, when sorting is fixed, please also add the ability to sort and additional filtering by fields:
    motherboard
    platform
    user
    date

    Also, please remove wrong results (as Multicore score = -2147483648) and add comparsion more then two results.

    Thank you

  6. 6 Posted by Colin on 13 Nov, 2019 05:53 PM

    Colin's Avatar

    Hi,

    Thanks for your additional suggestions! I've passed them along to my team as well, and I'll see if we can implement them in the future.

    Note that you can currently search by platform and motherboard in your queries. For example, try searching with platform:"macOS".

    Regarding incorrect results, we are regularly searching for results which appear to be incorrect. If you encounter any, please let us know and we'll investigate as soon as we can.

    All the best,
    Colin

    Primate Labs Inc.

  7. 7 Posted by geogan on 21 Oct, 2020 01:19 PM

    geogan's Avatar

    A year later and STILL NO SORTING functionality on Geekbench 5 results!??!

    https://browser.geekbench.com/v5/cpu/search?q=3900x

    I don't understand whats going on. Surely any of you in there that looked at the CPU results page for more than a second would realize its useless as a 39,445 long UNSORTED list???

  8. 8 Posted by Anton on 28 Nov, 2020 02:23 AM

    Anton's Avatar

    Just found that you can in fact sort! Just add the query parameters from the v4 sorted URL. For example, to find the fastest Geekbench5 3900x single-core scores:

    https://browser.geekbench.com/v5/cpu/search?q=3900x&dir=desc&sort=score

    To find the fastest multi-core scores:

    https://browser.geekbench.com/v5/cpu/search?q=3900x&dir=desc&sort=multicore_score

  9. 9 Posted by Anton on 29 Nov, 2020 05:52 PM

    Anton's Avatar

    Alternatively, perform the Geekbench 4 search you want to do, then replace the 'v4' in the URL with 'v5'.

  10. 10 Posted by Geekbench Canta... on 16 Oct, 2022 12:09 AM

    Geekbench Cantaffordawebdev's Avatar

    That’s nice. Why can’t they figure out how to simply allow users to sort and filter out the Bs they don’t wanna see right in the geekbench results? This is such a basic request. And get rid of all the stupid VM benchmarks. They are totally irrelevant to most people who are looking for bare metal performance. They can be quarantined off on their own dark corner for the folks who want to see geekbench scores of popular cloud offerings. 90% of site visitors are looking for bare metal performance benchmarks.

  11. 11 Posted by Artem S. Tashki... on 17 Oct, 2022 08:26 PM

    Artem S. Tashkinov's Avatar

    Yeah, and VM benchmarks can be endlessly gamed.

  12. 12 Posted by Artem S. Tashki... on 12 Sep, 2023 10:43 AM

    Artem S. Tashkinov's Avatar

    This has never been addressed or fixed.

  13. 13 Posted by GawG on 24 Sep, 2023 08:08 PM

    GawG's Avatar

    Geek bench 6 same. Really poor. I was going to get a licence but there are multiple sign ins with dam picture crap, even when logged in. Plus the compare function is broken, surprised by crappiness of site!

  14. 14 Posted by ehh0xff on 18 Jul, 2024 04:23 PM

    ehh0xff's Avatar

    Nothing has changed in 5 years. It is sad.

    Moreover, GB5 and GB6 are absolutely inapplicable:
    start from GB5 - no longer tests memory bandwidth and latency
    and GB6 give is generally useless test results - GB6 in the multi-threaded test results of two EPYC 9634 processors are equal in performance with Ryzen 7900x!?!

    GB4 and browser GB4 still more applicable then broken gb5/6.

Reply to this discussion

Internal reply

Formatting help / Preview (switch to plain text) No formatting (switch to Markdown)

Attaching KB article:

»

Attached Files

You can attach files up to 10MB

If you don't have an account yet, we need to confirm you're human and not a machine trying to post spam.

Keyboard shortcuts

Generic

? Show this help
ESC Blurs the current field

Comment Form

r Focus the comment reply box
^ + ↩ Submit the comment

You can use Command ⌘ instead of Control ^ on Mac